Technology & Science

China Orders Mechanical Door Handles on All New Cars From 2027

Beijing’s new national safety standard requires every passenger vehicle sold after 1 Jan 2027 to replace flush, power-actuated door handles with interior and exterior mechanical releases, giving already-approved models a grace period until 1 Jan 2029.

Focusing Facts

  1. Mandate covers all vehicles <3.5 t; compliance deadline: new models 1 Jan 2027, existing approvals 1 Jan 2029.
  2. MIIT data show 60 % of the top-100 new-energy vehicles sold in China in April 2025 used hidden or pop-out electronic handles.
  3. A Xiaomi SU7 crash in Chengdu in Oct 2025 killed the driver after an electronic handle jammed, catalyzing the rulemaking.

Context

Regulators have been here before: after a wave of post-war roll-overs, the U.S. 1966 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards forced mechanical latches and collapsible steering columns into every car, curbing a stylistic fad—1950s push-button doors—that looked advanced but failed in crashes. China’s decision echoes that episode, but with Beijing now acting as a global standard-setter rather than a fast follower. The measure spotlights two deeper currents: (1) the pendulum swing between design minimalism meant to optimise aerodynamics and the age-old engineering maxim that critical egress must never rely on software or power; (2) China’s growing use of its gargantuan domestic market (over 30 % of global auto sales) to export regulatory norms, just as California emissions rules reshaped engines worldwide in the 1990s. On a century scale this moment matters less for the handles themselves than for what it signals—the shift from Silicon-Valley-style “move fast” product aesthetics toward a safety-first governance model led by the world’s largest EV producer. If history rhymes, expect the 2027 rule to ripple outward, nudging global manufacturers back toward plain-spoken mechanical redundancy even as vehicles become rolling computers.

Perspectives

Tech outlets with consumer-safety emphasis

e.g., The Verge, International Business Times UKThey frame the ban as a necessary step after fatal crashes proved that flush-mounted electronic handles can trap occupants, portraying China as prioritising human life over futuristic styling. By celebrating regulation as inherently protective, they gloss over any cost, convenience or aerodynamic trade-offs and implicitly endorse broader government intervention in vehicle design.

Tesla-focused or enthusiast media

e.g., Teslarati, EV-fan publicationsCoverage stresses that the rule ‘kills’ a signature Tesla design cue and ends a trend the company pioneered, casting the decision as a direct setback for Elon Musk’s brand. The Tesla-centric angle centres on the company’s image and market impact, playing down the underlying safety failures and implying the ban is an over-reaction or competitively motivated.

Automotive trade press analysing industry impact

e.g., Auto Express, carandbikeThey present the measure as a watershed regulatory move that will force expensive redesigns worldwide and may push China into the role of global standards-setter for EVs. Focusing on design, cost and supply-chain disruption can underplay consumer-safety wins, subtly echoing automakers’ concerns about compliance burdens.

Go Deeper on Perplexity

Get the full picture, every morning.

Multi-perspective news analysis delivered to your inbox—free. We read 1,000s of sources so you don't have to.

One-click sign up. No spam, ever.