- At a Glance

  1. New START Treaty Lapses Amid Last-Minute, Unratified U.S.–Russia Abu Dhabi Talks
  2. Xi Executes Diplomatic Doubleheader: Same-Day Virtual Summit with Putin, Phone Call with Trump
  3. Russia Ends Trump-Brokered ‘Energy Ceasefire,’ Launches Massive Kyiv Barrage as Abu Dhabi Talks Begin
  4. U.S. Rebrands MSP as FORGE, Taps South Korea as Chair Until June 2026
  5. Kremlin Rebuts Trump’s Claim of Indian Exit from Russian Oil
  6. ECB Freezes Policy at 2 % as Euro Surge Tests Post-Cut 'Good Place'

New START Treaty Lapses Amid Last-Minute, Unratified U.S.–Russia Abu Dhabi Talks

At 00:00 GMT on 5 Feb 2026 the New START arms-control pact expired for lack of a signed extension, while negotiators in Abu Dhabi failed to clinch a formal deal, leaving both powers legally unconstrained for the first time in 54 years.

Perspectives

  1. Liberal internationalist and arms-control–oriented outlets: They frame the treaty’s lapse as a historic unravelling of the rules-based nuclear order that risks a costly new arms race and urge Washington to seize the last chance for an extension. By stressing apocalyptic imagery and pinning most blame on the Trump White House, they underplay Moscow’s earlier suspension of inspections and minimize political obstacles inside Russia or China that also complicate a deal. ( The Japan Times , Rolling Out )

  1. Russian state-run and Kremlin-sympathetic media: They highlight Moscow’s readiness to prolong New START for a year and portray the United States as the recalcitrant party endangering global stability. This narrative spotlights Russia’s ‘good-faith’ offer while glossing over its own suspension of treaty obligations and continued development of exotic delivery systems, redirecting responsibility to Washington for propaganda value. ( Sputnik International , Zero Hedge )

  1. US-allied security hawks and strategic think-tank analysts: They argue the treaty’s demise could be an opportunity to address China’s rapid nuclear build-up and that Washington may need freedom from New START limits to maintain credible deterrence alongside allies like Australia and Japan. By focusing on China’s rise and allied deterrence needs, they normalize a larger US arsenal and treat renewed competition as acceptable, downplaying escalation risks and the loss of verified transparency mechanisms. ( The Strategist , Malay Mail )

Global & US Headlines

Business & Economics

Technology & Science

Previous Issues