Global & US Headlines

U.S. Indefinitely Pauses Immigrant Visas for 75 Nations under Expanded ‘Public Charge’ Rule

On 15 Jan 2026 the State Department ordered consulates to stop issuing immigrant (green-card) visas to applicants from 75 named countries starting 21 Jan 2026 while it re-writes screening rules.

Focusing Facts

  1. Freeze covers 75 countries—about 38 % of all nations—and takes legal effect 21 Jan 2026 with no end date announced.
  2. Order targets only permanent-resident visas; tourist, student and work visas continue to be processed.
  3. State Department cites elevated post-arrival welfare utilization but has released no country-level data to substantiate the claim.

Context

Washington has invoked “public charge” language since the 1882 Immigration Act, which barred paupers and later infamously underpinned the 1924 national-origin quotas; today’s action echoes those precedents by linking admissibility to predicted fiscal burden rather than security or skills. Like the 2017 “Travel Ban” that initially covered seven Muslim-majority states, the current freeze was announced through a leaked memo, suggesting policy made via executive fiat and likely to spur courtroom tests and quiet diplomatic horse-trading. Structurally, the move fits a century-long oscillation in U.S. policy between expansion (1965 Hart-Celler, 1990 IMMACT) and contraction during periods of economic anxiety or nativist upswings. Over a 100-year horizon the episode may matter less for the temporary halt itself—which could be reversed by a future administration or the courts—than for normalising welfare-based exclusion criteria and empowering consular officers’ subjective judgments, a trend that, if sustained, could reshape family-based migration flows and the demographic makeup of the U.S. for decades.

Perspectives

Media outlets from affected countries such as Pakistan and Nigeria

Daily Times, VanguardThey portray the visa freeze as a sudden, opaque setback that will strand family-reunification applicants and strain bilateral ties. Coverage centres on local hardship and diplomatic slight, giving little weight to U.S. welfare-usage data and thereby rallying domestic sentiment against Washington.

Right-leaning, pro-Trump news sites

Devdiscourse, SwarajyamagThey frame the suspension as a justified crack-down to shield American taxpayers from welfare-dependent immigrants, underscoring Trump’s America-first agenda. The stories adopt administration talking points and offer scant scrutiny of the evidence or humanitarian costs, reflecting partisan alignment with conservative U.S. immigration policy.

Business and tourism-focused regional press

Asharq Al-Awsat English, The StatesmanReports stress that only immigrant visas are paused, assuring readers that visitor, student and business travel will continue uninterrupted and tourism should remain safe. By emphasizing the limited scope, they may understate the broader impact on families and migrants to calm industry worries and protect economic interests.

Go Deeper on Perplexity

Get the full picture, every morning.

Multi-perspective news analysis delivered to your inbox—free. We read 1,000s of sources so you don't have to.

One-click sign up. No spam, ever.