Global & US Headlines

Zelensky Fires Power-Broker Yermak After $100 M Energoatom Graft Probe and U.S. Peace-Deal Standoff

On 28 Nov 2025, President Zelensky accepted the resignation of chief-of-staff Andriy Yermak hours after anti-corruption agents raided Yermak’s Kyiv residence, abruptly removing Ukraine’s lead U.S. peace negotiator amid a widening $100 million Energoatom kickback scandal.

Focusing Facts

  1. NABU and SAP raided Yermak’s apartment inside the presidential compound at dawn on 28 Nov 2025; Zelensky announced the resignation in his nightly address the same day.
  2. Operation “Midas” alleges Energoatom officials skimmed 10-15 % of contracts, laundering over $100 million through a Kyiv office tied to ex-MP Andriy Derkach.
  3. Zelensky named Gen. Andrii Hnatov, FM Andrii Sybiha, and Security Council head Rustem Umerov to replace Yermak in upcoming U.S. talks.

Context

Kyiv has sacked presidential enforcers before—Oleksii Honcharuk in March 2020, or Oleksii Reznikov in Sept 2023—but toppling a sitting chief-of-staff while war rages recalls Premier Pavlo Lazarenko’s 1998 corruption fall and even Hetman Skoropadskyi’s 1918 collapse: domestic legitimacy evaporated just as foreign powers rewrote the map. Today’s purge exposes two structural currents. First, post-Soviet Ukraine’s cyclic struggle to build rule-of-law institutions strong enough to axe a ‘green cardinal’ even during existential war—NABU’s dawn raid suggests those institutions now act with a reach unseen in past crises. Second, the episode underscores how outside patrons—this time Washington and Moscow via Trump’s back-channel plan—leverage Ukraine’s scandals to press their own agendas, a pattern visible from the 1994 Budapest Memorandum to the 2014 IMF anti-graft conditionality. Whether Yermak’s exit weakens or liberates Zelensky will echo for decades: if Ukraine finally enshrines independent anti-corruption enforcement, the raid may mark a pivot like Italy’s 1992 “Clean Hands.” If instead the vacuum stalls peace talks and fractures the Servant-of-the-People bloc, it could hasten a 1919-style political unraveling. In a century’s view, the moment tests whether a wartime republic can institutionalize accountability without forfeiting strategic autonomy.

Perspectives

Mainstream Western press

The New York Times, The Times of IsraelTreat Yermak’s resignation as a watershed test of Kyiv’s commitment to anti-corruption while warning that it complicates Zelensky’s U.S-led peace talks. By spotlighting functioning watchdogs and a ‘reset’ in the presidential office, these outlets reinforce a narrative that Ukraine remains a reform-minded democracy worthy of continued Western backing, glossing over how entrenched the corruption appears or how hard Washington is pushing Kyiv on concessions.

Russian state media

RT and outlets echoing Kremlin messagingCast the scandal and resignation as proof of a deep internal crisis and of Zelensky’s weak, corrupt rule, implying that Ukraine is unraveling under U.S. pressure. Language like “gutted” and Kremlin spokesman quotes serve Moscow’s interest in undermining international sympathy for Kyiv and framing any Ukrainian refusal to concede territory as irrational self-inflicted chaos.

Right-leaning U.S. media

New York PostPortray Trump as the indispensable deal-maker and emphasize that Zelensky’s camp misled the public about progress on a peace plan until Trump publicly corrected them. By centering Trump’s Truth Social post and depicting Yermak’s shock, the coverage elevates Trump’s statesmanship, downplays Ukrainian agency, and fits a partisan narrative that the former president alone can swiftly end the war.

Go Deeper on Perplexity

Get the full picture, every morning.

Multi-perspective news analysis delivered to your inbox—free. We read 1,000s of sources so you don't have to.

One-click sign up. No spam, ever.