Business & Economics
Metaplanet’s $61 M Bitcoin Buy Caps Week of Record Corporate Accumulation
Between 12–13 Aug 2025, a fresh wave of corporate purchases—led by Metaplanet’s 518 BTC add—pushed total public-company holdings past 791 k BTC and helped Norway’s $1.9 T wealth fund lift its indirect stake 192 % year-on-year.
Focusing Facts
- Metaplanet bought 518 BTC for $61.4 M on 12 Aug 2025, raising its treasury to 18,113 BTC (≈$2.15 B).
- Norway’s sovereign fund NBIM held 7,161 BTC indirectly at end-Q2 2025—3,340 BTC more than six months earlier and 192 % above 2024 levels.
- Public-company treasuries collectively control 791,662 BTC (≈3.8 % of supply) as of July 2025, exceeding $100 B in value for the first time.
Context
Corporate hoarding of hard assets is hardly new—the 1880s railroads stockpiled steel rails and, more pointedly, U.S. firms such as Ford and Kodak warehoused silver bars in the 1960s when monetary regimes wobbled. Today’s BTC buying echoes that playbook but grafts it onto a digitally scarce asset with a capped float. Since MicroStrategy’s 2020 pivot (itself reminiscent of treasuries shifting into euro-denominated bonds after the 1999 launch of the single currency), balance-sheet Bitcoin has moved from fringe experiment to mainstream tactic: 43 listed holders in 2023, 160 in 2025. The NBIM data point is crucial—it signals that even conservative sovereign pools now accept indirect crypto exposure, erasing a psychological barrier set by the 2008–09 crisis when such funds fled risk. Over a 100-year horizon the episode matters less for its headline dollar value than for what it says about institutional path-dependence: once large entities embed a non-sovereign reserve asset, political efforts to unwind it (cf. Nixon’s 1971 gold freeze) become messy and systemic. If the trend continues, future liquidity shocks will be mediated not by central-bank swap lines but by the concentration—or forced relinquishment—of corporate Bitcoin treasuries.
Perspectives
Bitcoin-bullish crypto outlets
e.g., Bitcoin Magazine, Bitcoinist.com, Coingape — They portray the wave of corporate and whale accumulation as proof that institutional adoption is accelerating and will catapult Bitcoin to fresh record highs. Their coverage glosses over volatility and concentration dangers, sustaining hype that attracts traffic and aligns with commercial relationships, such as Bitcoin Magazine’s disclosed partnership with a treasury-building firm.
Risk-focused crypto market commentators
e.g., Cointelegraph analysts, cryptonews.com — They acknowledge the buying spree but warn that heavily concentrated corporate treasuries could become systemic weak points and might even face future government seizure or financing stress. By amplifying speculative scenarios like potential U.S. nationalization, they court attention and hedge against optimism, drawing on analyst opinions rather than hard evidence.
Institutional finance-oriented crypto news outlets
e.g., Crypto Briefing, CryptoSlate — They frame rising indirect exposure by players such as Norway’s sovereign wealth fund as a sign Bitcoin is becoming a routine component of diversified institutional portfolios. Highlighting headline percentage growth can overstate the significance of relatively modest, indirect bets while ignoring that the fund still avoids holding crypto directly.